© 2017 Christy K Robinson
This article is copyrighted. Copying, even to your genealogy pages, is prohibited by US and international law. You may "share" it with the URL link because it preserves the author's copyright notice and the source of the article.
All rights reserved. This book or blog article, or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the author except for the use of brief quotations in a book review.
Since Mary and William Dyer were respected and in a higher merchant class, as well as William's social status as colonial attorney general, they wouldn't be wearing court dress of the aristocrats, but they'd be very well turned out with fabrics, colors, and ornaments like collars and hats.
When they moved from London to Boston, they probably wore more sober Puritan dress, but even so, it would have been of high quality, with laces and quality boots to show their status and educational level. But for some years, there were no riding horses or carriages, so most people, even Gov. John Winthrop, walked for miles in sunshine, rain, or snow.
When they moved to Rhode Island, they would have added clothing that would be practical for their farming and sailing activities, though they certainly would have had servants and laborers to do heavier chores than feeding poultry or milking goats. Of course, William would have had courtroom clothes (and possibly a wig), and Mary would have dressed plainly when she became a Quaker in the 1650s. Plain doesn't mean shabby, though--unless you think of living in the same clothes for weeks or months at a time while in prison. She was still expected to maintain a dress standard to honor her husband's social and professional status. There's no evidence that she was criticized for immodesty or dressing too poshly or poorly, so she must have found the right balance.
1. 1660s: Dutch woman reading (detail), by Pieter Janssens Elinga |
3. About 1615: Lady Arabella Stuart, falsely claimed to be Mary Dyer's biological mother. |
4. 1630: Four Figures at Table, by Louis Le Nain
|
5. 1620s-30s: Netherlands Family Making Music, Molenaer
|
6. 1600s- Cecelia, by Bernardo Strozzi
|
7. 1615-Frances Howard, Countess Somerset
|
8. In 1630 London, this was the suggested "look" for the English gentleman. Click photo to enlarge, so you can see the smaller images around the border. |
9. 1630s: English satin evening dress.
This is how Queen Henrietta Maria dressed. |
10. 1630s-40s: Country woman
|
11. 1630s-40s: Lady of the court
|
12. 1630s-40s: English dress with lace shawl collar, fur muff
|
13. 1630s-40s: English gentlewoman
|
14. 1630s-40s: English, modest dress and coif (woman's cap)
|
15. 1630s-40s: English, modest dress and coif |
16. 1630s-40s: Merchant's wife of London
|
17. 1630: Helene Fourment in her wedding gown. She was married to painter Peter-Paul Rubens. |
19. Anabaptist family, suppertime. Unknown year and country.
|
20. 1630s-Queen Henrietta Maria of England.
Note the crown near her left hand. |
21. 1630-35: Family group in a landscape, England
|
23. 1630s-woman's shoe height related to societal status
|
24. 1633: Henrietta Maria of France, Queen consort of England.
A Catholic, she dressed more modestly than many Anglican and Puritan women of her time. |
Part two of two on this subject coming soon!
************************************
Christy K Robinson is author of these books:
We Shall Be Changed (2010)
Mary Dyer Illuminated Vol. 1 (2013)
Mary Dyer: For Such a Time as This Vol. 2 (2014)
The Dyers of London, Boston, & Newport Vol. 3 (2014)
Effigy Hunter (2015)
Anne Marbury Hutchinson: American Founding Mother (2018)
And of these sites:
Discovering Love (inspiration and service)
Rooting for Ancestors (history and genealogy)
William and Mary Barrett Dyer (17th century culture and history of England and New England)
What? No cod pieces for the men???
ReplyDelete