© 2012 Christy K Robinson
This article is copyrighted. Copying, even to your genealogy pages, is prohibited by US and international law. You may "share" it with the URL link because it preserves the author's copyright notice and the source of the article.
All rights reserved. This book or blog article, or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the author except for the use of brief quotations in a book review.
The sacrifice of Mary Dyer’s life in 1660 had direct bearing
on the Rhode Island Charter of 1663 which legally granted liberty of
conscience, and eventually on the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791, and in the 20th century, the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
In an article on Major William Dyre (son of William and Mary
Dyer), by Colonel J. Granville Leach, LL.B., is this paragraph:
Whoever that English writer was, I agree with his
assumption.
Mary Dyer’s choice to die a shameful death in order to shock and
outrage the Massachusetts public into understanding that her brothers and
sisters in the faith were only carrying out the gospel commission (visiting the
sick and imprisoned, treating the “least” members of society as they would
treat their Lord, and proclaiming the Light of the world), was described in a
booklet that was sent to King Charles II of England, their monarch. Edward
Burrough wrote
A Declaration of the Sad
and Great Persecution and Martyrdom of the People of God, called Quakers, in New-England, for
the Worshipping of God, which you can
download here. The immediate
effect of the King reading the booklet was his directive to stop the hangings
entirely. It also slowed and lessened the other torture on religious dissenters
for a few years.
The Burrough booklet was based on the original, hand-written letter of Mary Barrett Dyer, written in her prison cell in October 1659. If you look at the menu of this website, for Dyer letter reproductions, you can learn more about Mary's letter, which is quite different from Burrough's version! Take a look at my analysis of the two versions of her letter here:
https://marybarrettdyer.blogspot.com/2014/02/a-mystery-cloaked-in-obvious.html . Mary's fiery letter was forgotten in an archive, while Burrough's toned-down book became established "history," and was even quoted in part on the Boston statue of Mary Dyer. I have obtained reproduction rights to the image of Mary's letter, and sell the prints through this website.
After civil wars in England
and two decades of parliamentary (puritan) rule, Charles had been restored to
the English throne in 1660, and was crowned in London
two days before Mary was hanged in Boston.
Although nominally the head of the Church of England, his beliefs were
inherited from his French Catholic mother, Queen Henrietta Maria, and further
formed during his exile in Catholic France.
The Puritan English Parliament during the interregnum would
not grant a charter that included religious liberties, and Charles II was not
very keen on it, either—until, with the combination of Mary’s death as described by Edward Burrough, and Dr.
John Clarke’s persistence, he granted the Rhode Island charter in 1663. (I prefer to
think he was more high-minded and sympathetic with Rhode Islanders, than punitive
to the Puritans who had beheaded his father--and might now be harboring the regicides in New England, but it could have been both!)
|
Dr. John Clarke, architect of the 1663 Rhode Island charter |
Having read several pieces written by Attorney General William Dyer (Mary’s
husband), I believe that some of the provisions of the 1663 charter of
liberties granted by King Charles II to Rhode Island and Providence Plantations
were not only the invention of Dr. John Clarke (architect and primary author of
the charters) and Rev. Roger Williams (founder of Providence Plantations, governor,
and respected thought-leader of Rhode Island colony), but pet issues of William
Dyer’s, particularly after the repeated imprisonment and eventual execution of
his wife, Mary. (Dyer is mentioned twice in the charter, along with two dozen
other men who were purchasers, founders, and principal men of Rhode Island.)
- Freedom
of conscience to worship (or not) as they thought best.
- Dissent
from Church of England beliefs, without penalty, is allowed.
- Settlers/pioneers
left England for
religious freedom and to work hard for a new life (risking lives and
fortunes), but were ejected from Massachusetts
for religious reasons and had to start over again in perilous
circumstances.
- Shipping
and Newport’s
seaport trade.
- Right
of free passage through New England
colonies (this nullifies the banishment orders of Massachusetts).
|
1663--Rhode Island's royal charter (click to enlarge) |
This is the portion of the 1663 Charter (constitution) for
Rhode Island Colony that grants a separation between civil and religious
matters, and the liberty to believe and practice religion as they believed
best. Though framed by Dr. Clarke, Rev. Roger Williams, and Attorney General William Dyer, it’s written in the
“voice” of King Charles II, as he was granting the rights to his colony.
And
whereas, in theire humble addresse, they have ffreely declared, that it is much
on their hearts (if they may be permitted), to hold forth a livlie experiment,
that a most flourishing civill state
may stand and best bee maintained, and that among our English subjects. with a full libertie in religious concernements;
and that true pietye rightly grounded upon gospell principles, will give the
best and greatest security to sovereignetye, and will lay in the hearts of men
the strongest obligations to true loyaltye: Now know bee, that wee beinge
willinge to encourage the hopefull undertakeinge of oure sayd lovall and
loveinge subjects, and to secure them in
the free exercise and enjovment of all theire civill and religious rights,
appertaining to them, as our loveing subjects; and to preserve unto them that
libertye, in the true Christian ffaith and worshipp of God, which they have
sought with soe much travaill, and with peaceable myndes, and lovall
subjectione to our royall progenitors and ourselves, to enjoye; and because some of the people and inhabitants of the
same colonie cannot, in theire private opinions, conforms to the publique
exercise of religion, according to the litturgy, formes and ceremonyes of
the Church of England, or take or subscribe the oaths and articles made and
established in that behalfe; and for that the same, by reason of the remote
distances of those places, will (as wee hope) bee noe breach of the unitie and
unifformitie established in this nation:
Have therefore thought ffit, and doe hereby publish, graunt, ordeyne and
declare, That our royall will and pleasure is, that noe person within the sayd colonye, at any tyme hereafter, shall bee
any wise molested, punished, disquieted, or called in question, for any
differences in opinione in matters of religion, and doe not actually disturb
the civill peace of our sayd colony; but that all and everye person and
persons may, from tyme to tyme, and at all tymes hereafter, freelye and fullye have and enjoye his and
theire owne judgments and consciences, in matters of religious concernments,
throughout the tract of land hereafter mentioned; they behaving themselves
peaceablie and quietlie, and not useing this libertie to lycentiousnesse and
profanenesse, nor to the civill injurye or outward disturbeance of others; any
lawe, statute, or clause, therein contayned, or to bee contayned, usage or
custome of this realme, to the contrary hereof, in any wise, notwithstanding.
Rhode Island
became a sanctuary for people who had been persecuted elsewhere for their
convictions. One hundred thirty years after the charter, America’s
“Founding Fathers” (actually, I prefer the first colonials to have that title,
but it’s not my call!) framed a constitution and the amendments to it called
the Bill of Rights, based in part on the Magna Carta, the Rhode island charter,
the 1786
Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, other documents, and some very creative, brilliant thinking.
The first amendment to the US Constitution is:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or
of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances."
Whether or not you believe in God or a higher power, when you hear the words “First Amendment rights,” remember
Mary Dyer, and that her cause and her death were the motive for separation of church
and state in America,
and freedom to worship (or not) and speak
according to your conscience. Not the conscience of the government, or of morality groups, a church, or any others. The government cannot establish or prohibit your religious beliefs and activities.
************
Related story on Mary Dyer: The Anniversary of our Civil Rights
How and why did Mary Dyer die? Click:
Top 10 Things You May Not Know About Mary Dyer
From Ken, in Michigan, posted in Goodreads:
ReplyDeleteWow, they got it right! Almost 352 years later there are still well intentioned folks who none-the-less want the government to establish a state religion and limit free speech. Thanks to "first colonials" and the "founding fathers" who recognized this human trait/flaw and included the protection against it in the first amendment.
Patti O'Sullivan posted in Facebook:
ReplyDeleteAnother thoughtful post, Christy. Rhode Island's contributions to American ideals cannot be overstated. Its founders created a colony that became a beacon of religious freedom, the peaceful co-existence of diverse peoples, and prosperity built on innovation rather than on the backs of the poor. This is not to say that things were perfect then - it was the 17th century - but we would do well as a nation to remember the lessons Rhode Island has to teach.
Most adults today are 12 to 14 generations removed from Mary and William Dyer. If it's 12 generations (as it is for me), that's 9-greats grandparents, sometimes abbreviated as "9ggm," ninth great-grandmother.
ReplyDeleteChristy K Robinson