Puritans versus the Book of Common Prayer
© 2012 Christy K Robinson
This article is copyrighted. Copying, even to your genealogy pages, is prohibited by US and international law. You may "share" it with the URL link because it preserves the author's copyright notice and the source of the article.
All rights reserved. This book or blog article, or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the author except for the use of brief quotations in a book review.
|
The Book of Common Prayer, 1662 edition |
The Book of Common
Prayer has been used by Anglicans since 1549. It contains the
liturgy for various worship and sacramental services, including baptism, marriage,
funeral, and communion (Eucharist) ceremonies, as well as the scripture
readings for the holidays of the church year, and of course, prayers for all occasions. The book has been updated over
the centuries and decades, but some phrases, particularly in the wedding service,
remain virtually unchanged: “dearly beloved,” “until death do us part,” “ashes
to ashes,” and many others.
Non-conformists like the Puritans (who considered themselves
reforming members of the Church of England) resisted or refused use of the BCP on the grounds that the Anglican church
had not broken completely with the Roman Catholics at the Reformation. Puritans
pointed to the priests’ garment (the surplice), bowing to the communion bread
and wine (idolatry because the Eucharist were symbols, not God’s flesh and
blood), the use of musical instruments and vocal harmony in services, and the
stained glass and religious art, as proof that the Reformation had not put off
these distractions for pure and holy worship of God. The Book of Common Prayer was too ritualized for Puritan tastes.
William
Laud, Bishop of Bath, Wells, and London in the 1620s, was a “favorite” of King Charles I of England, and
although he held some beliefs in common with Puritans and had at one time given
them a measure of support or tolerance, he became increasingly authoritarian in
his administration of church discipline. In 1633, he was enthroned as Archbishop
of Canterbury, and his restrictive and punitive policies in pursuit of uniformity actually
spurred the Great Migration of Puritans from England
to North America.
The Book of Common
Prayer was not a favorite in Massachusetts Bay Colony, a theocracy ruled by
Puritan/Congregationalist magistrates and ministers. Nor was it approved in Plymouth, New
Haven, or Connecticut Colonies. It wasn’t banned
because the Church of England was nominally the state religion, but neither was
it used in New England churches in the mid-17th century.
Because Rhode
Island colonists were exiled from other colonies for
their dissidence to Puritanism, the BCP
was never an issue there. From its inception in 1638, Rhode Island separated civil and
ecclesiastical powers and its citizens enjoyed freedom of religion.
|
The BCP bound together with Psalms and the Greek New Testament, in the same way John Winthrop Jr.'s book was bound. The mouse ate the part of the book that was exposed to him, which would have been the BCP, not the Bible. Winthrop's miracle story is humorous when you know how the book was bound. |
John Winthrop Sr., governor of Massachusetts Bay colony for most
of his nineteen years in Boston,
was an attorney and magistrate, and one of the investors in the Massachusetts
Bay Company. He ordered government on Puritan beliefs and with his business and
ministerial partners, created a theocracy. Winthrop kept a journal intended to
be a historical record of the founding of the colony. Many of the events he
reported were infused with moral conclusions, like this little gem below.
Notice that he doesn’t actually criticize the Book of Common Prayer—he only wonders
at the strange occurrence. The reader is left to conclude that even vermin were
directed by God in their foraging.
December 15, 1640—“About this time there was a thing worthy of
observation. Mr. Winthrop the younger [the governor's son], one of the magistrates, having many
books in a chamber where there was corn of divers sorts [wheat, barley, rye,
Indian corn], had among them one wherein the Greek [New] testament, the psalms,
and the common prayer were bound
together. He found the common prayer
eaten with mice, every leaf of it, and not any of the two other touched, nor
any other of his books, though there were above a thousand.” ~ Journal of Gov. John Winthrop
It seemed miraculously clear to John Winthrop Sr. that God had made his will plain on the matter of the
Book of Common Prayer and what it was good for: mouse chow.
On the other hand, the Anglican hand, the mice could be considered highly selective in their choice. The winter stores of grain were not good enough for these critters. No, they knew Jesus' proverb that “It is written: ‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.’"
Matthew 4:4.
In the English Civil War, Parliamentary forces took Archbishop Laud captive. He was imprisoned for four years and executed
in 1645. The
BCP was outlawed during
the reign of Parliament and the Commonwealth
of Oliver Cromwell, and
replaced with the
Directory for Publique Worship.
When Charles II was restored to the English throne in 1660,
the BCP was brought back for use in
Anglican churches and revised. The Act of Uniformity
was passed on 19 May 1662, and the Book
of Common Prayer returned to use in July.
What a delicious post, Christy!
ReplyDeleteThanks you, a very interesting post! Anyone wishing to find out more about the 350th anniversary, there is a site here: http://www.bcp350.org/ - and there is a Prayer Book Society: http://www.pbs.org.uk/
ReplyDeleteHistorical fiction fans will also have read about the Prayer Book's principal author, Thomas Cranmer, in Hilary Mantel's multi-prize winning WOLF HALL.
Thanks for referring me to this article, Christy. A different perspective on the politicization of church worship in the seventeenth century.
ReplyDelete