Wednesday, September 19, 2012

The Ghost of Mary Dyer


The Founding Fanatics
The Ghost of Mary Dyer

by David Macary, guest author

Although we regularly hear people (commentators, politicians, citizens) refer with pride to our Founding Fathers, it’s unclear whether they’re familiar with the relevant dates. Because if they had done the arithmetic, they surely would’ve noticed that every one of these illustrious “founders” had been born more than a century after this country was already formed.

Jamestown, the first permanent English settlement in America, was established in 1607, and Plymouth, the second settlement, was established in 1620. By contrast, George Washington was born in 1732, John Adams in 1735, Thomas Jefferson in 1743, and James Madison in 1751.

Technically, these men didn’t “found” us. What they did was engineer our independence from England and invent our federal government, two magnificent achievements that set us on the successful course we’ve followed ever since. But let’s be clear: This country’s ethos—its customs, social rituals, religious beliefs, rural economy, national character—had been in place for a 150 years (that’s six generations) before Jefferson, Madison, et al, ever hung out their shingles.

We were taught in school that the Pilgrims came to America in order to practice “religious freedom.” While that statement is more or less accurate, what they fail to mention is that the Puritans were 17th-century England’s version of the Taliban. These religious zealots wanted to “purify” Christianity (hence “Puritans”) in much the same way that the Taliban wants to purify Islam.

Indeed, if we wished to be brutally honest, we could say that America was founded by a bunch of religious fanatics, and that it was the framers of the Constitution (educated products of the Enlightenment) who, bless their hearts, saved us from them.

How fanatical were they? Fanatical enough, in 1660, to execute the first female in the colonies. Her name was Mary Dyer. She, along with three male associates [Robinson, Stevenson, Leddra], were hanged by Massachusetts Bay Colony authorities. Dyer and the men had repeatedly ignored warnings not to set foot in Massachusetts, where Quakerism was outlawed, and when the warnings went unheeded, the Colony hanged them.

One can think of many religious people who deserve to be hanged, but Quakers aren’t among them. In fact, Quakerism, with its pacifism and equality for women, seems like one of the more enlightened, dignified religions. But in 1660, the good citizens of Massachusetts chose to kill a group of settlers whose only crime was belonging to another faith and defying the orthodox theocracy. And they killed them in the name of Jesus Christ.

As far as theology goes, our neighbors to the north are, by all accounts, nowhere near as demonstrably religious as we are. A few years ago, I saw Kim Campbell (former Prime Minister of Canada) on Bill Maher’s HBO television show. The panel was discussing the comparative role that religion played in the politics of Canada and America.

Reminded of the fact that George W. Bush had declared, after announcing his candidacy, that he believed God wanted him to run for president, Campbell observed that if a Canadian politician had said the same thing, people would think he was “mentally ill.” And as many will recall, during the 2008 Republican primary, three candidates (Tom Tancredo, Sam Brownback and Mike Huckabee) proudly admitted that they didn’t believe in evolution.

Our history is filled with paradoxes. We embrace founders who didn’t actually “found” us, we applaud the Pilgrims for seeking religious freedom when, in fact, they were vehemently intolerant, and we assume we were established as a reverently Christian, God-fearing nation even though the framers took careful steps to ensure that we would never become a theocracy.

In this post-New Deal, post-industrial milieu we find ourselves, we have both kinds of voters: the kind who vote for candidates on the basis of their positions on specific issues (health care, tax reform, trade policy, etc.), and the kind who ignore the boring nuts-and-bolts stuff and simply vote for the candidate they regard as the “most religious.”

And when the Tea Party says that they “want their country back,” and evangelicals say that we will never again be the nation we once were until “we put Jesus Christ back into our lives,” we’re reminded of not only how polarized we are, but of how the ghost of Mary Dyer—the first woman in Colonial America to be executed for civil disobedience—still haunts us.
***** 
For more information on Mary Dyer and why she chose to die for her principles, please click these links:
Top 10 Things You May Not Know About Mary Dyer
Mary Dyer and the First Amendment, 1660-1791

Thank you, David, for this insightful article, used by written permission of the author. 
David Macaray, a Los Angeles playwright and author (It’s Never Been Easy: Essays on Modern Labor), is a former labor union rep. He can be reached by email.

4 comments:

  1. I recommend reading "American Jezebel", the story of Anne Hutchinson, my 8th gr grandmother, a female entering the man's world by becoming a puritan preacher. Mary Dyer was a follower of Anne's. Anne was forced by law to remove herself from Mass and went to Rhode Island to live. Mary followed her but then returned to Boston and was executed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, "American Jezebel" was a good book, and I've asked its author, Eve LaPlante, to guest-write for this blog.

      Mary and William Dyer did follow Anne Hutchinson and scores of other Boston exiles to found Portsmouth and then Newport, Rhode Island; but Mary's several return trips to Boston were separated by nearly two decades, a lot of politics, and Mary's conviction that she was obeying the voice of God.

      Delete
  2. To play Devil's Advocate, Mary and other Quakers who were executed and abused weren't the only ones who said they were doing God's work. The Puritans hanged Quakers and unrepentant witches to save their own people from Satan's influence. Now, don't accuse me of agreeing with them!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I omitted something in my comment above: early Friends were pacifists, but they also used civil disobedience tactics which outraged the Puritans, and made them fear that Satan was behind those acts.

    Mary Dyer was executed for nothing more controversial than defying her order of banishment to visit jailed Friends. However, other Quakers disrupted church services and court meetings to debate with ministers and magistrates, and what they said was considered heresy by the Puritans.

    Heretics were regularly executed in Europe, as were witches (who were also considered to be Satan's minions). Perhaps it is fortunate that only four Quakers were executed in Massachusetts, when nineteen accused witches were put to death three decades later.

    ReplyDelete

Reasonable, thoughtful comments are encouraged. Impolite comments will be "moderated" to the recycle bin.